Analysing the slogan "LUBER" in Indonesia's 2024 general election: A critical discourse analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v3i1.39Keywords:
general election, critical discourse analysis, luber, political communication, Indonesian general electionAbstract
The year 2024 marks a crucial moment for Indonesia as the nation prepares for its five-yearly general election to elect a new president. At the forefront of this electoral process is the distinctive slogan “LUBER,” representing the principles of Langsung (Direct), Umum (Public), Bebas (Free), and Rahasia (Secret). This study seeks to explore into the form, function, and meaning of the “LUBER” slogan, aiming to unravel its significance in the socio-political landscape of Indonesia. The primary purpose of this research is to dissect the “LUBER” slogan, examining its linguistic and rhetorical features, its intended functions within the electoral context, and the underlying meanings it conveys to the Indonesian electorate. By undertaking this analysis, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the slogan operates as a discourse tool in shaping public perception and participation in the upcoming general election. The study employs a two-fold methodological approach, incorporating document study and critical discourse analysis (CDA). Document study involves a comprehensive review of official election materials, speeches, and campaign documents, while CDA focuses on dissecting the language, rhetoric, and discursive strategies employed in the “LUBER” slogan. The analysis reveals that the “LUBER” slogan strategically combines linguistic elements to convey a message of transparency, inclusivity, freedom, and confidentiality in the electoral process. Through CDA, we uncover how the slogan operates as a powerful discourse tool, influencing public opinion and fostering a sense of civic responsibility. Additionally, the study identifies subtle nuances in the language used, shedding light on the socio-political implications of the “LUBER” slogan.
In conclusion, the “LUBER” slogan serves as a multifaceted discourse tool in Indonesia’s 2024 general election, embodying the principles of transparency and democratic values. The linguistic and rhetorical features of the slogan play a pivotal role in shaping public perception and encouraging active civic participation. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of political discourse in shaping electoral processes and underscores the importance of linguistic analysis in decoding the complexities of political communication.
References
Abdellaoui, S. (2022). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Gender at the Micro and Macro Levels in The Moroccan Translation Classroom. Traduction et Langues, 21(2), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.52919/translang.v21i2.905
Al-Badawi, M., & Al Najjar, I. (2021). Critical discourse analysis of BBC and CNN political news’ headlines on the Christchurch Mosque Massacre in New Zealand. Open Linguistics, 7(1), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0175
Armayanti, R. (2019). A Review of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) on Qualitative Research. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 1(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v1i1.2768
Bowden, S., Kirubarajan, A., Balbaa, A., Berditchevskaia, I., Freeman, S., Klostermann, N., Naguib, M., Kurabi, B., Law, M., & Lazor, J. (2022). Canadian medical education journal. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 2(1), 16–22. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/36556
Cubero, M., Bascón, M. J., & Cubero-Pérez, R. (2020). “My tutor doesn’t say that”: The legitimized voices in dialogic reflection on teaching practices. Dialogic Pedagogy, 8(2020), SA26–SA44. https://doi.org/10.5195/DPJ.2020.311
Diniar, A. H., & Kiryanto, K. (2016). ANALISIS DAMPAK PEMILU PRESIDEN JOKOWI TERHADAP RETURN SAHAM (Studi Kasus Saham LQ-45 di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 4(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.30659/jai.4.2.97-108
Haslina, W. (2023). Anies Baswedan’s 2024 Candidacy Presidential Declaration: Norman Faircough Critical Discourse Analysis (Deklarasi Capres 2024 Anies Baswedan: Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough). Gramatika STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 9(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2023.v9i2.7381
Mallya, D., & Susanti, R. (2021). Theorizing race, marginalization, and language in the digital media. Communication and Society, 34(2), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.2.403-415
Martika, D., Mahyuni, & Azis, A. D. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama Speech. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(2c), 1020–1031.
Meylinda, L. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perception on Online EFL Learning through WhatsApp Application. English Learning Innovation, 4(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v4i1.23622
Mullet, D. R. (2018). A General Critical Discourse Analysis Framework for Educational Research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18758260
My Nhat, T. N., & Thu Hien, H. T. (2023). Construction of roles, obligations and values in politicians’ discourses on anti-corruption. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2249286
Nasution, S. S., Sukmawati, N. N., Lubis, A. A., Hastomo, T., & Sesriyani, L. (2020). Using critical discourse analysis to explore an authentic teaching material: A focus on language and power. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16636
Pires, K. C., & Peixoto, R. A. J. R. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis and Lexical Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Interpreting of the US and China Defense White Papers. Estudos Internacionais, 10(2), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2022v10.n2.p96
Prasetiyo, A. B., & Sukarno, N. (2022). Konstruksi Pemikiran-Pemikiran Anies Baswedan dalam Menangani Pandemi Covid-19. Suar Betang, 17(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v17i1.320
Ronaldo, R., & Darmaiza, D. (2021). Politisasi Agama dan Politik Kebencian pada Pemilu Presiden Indonesia 2019. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 3(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v3i1.150
Santoso, D., & Aji, A. S. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis on Joko Widodo’s Speech Using Thomas N. Huckin’s Theory. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (ICoRSH 2020), 584(Icorsh 2020), 886–894. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icorsh-20/125962368
Stewart, N. K., Al-Rawi, A., Celestini, C., & Worku, N. (2023). Hate Influencers’ Mediation of Hate on Telegram: “We Declare War Against the Anti-White System.” Social Media and Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177915
Sukma, A. I., Asidiky, Z., & Agustian, A. F. (2023). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of the Endangered Tigers in WWF Posters. Journal of Language and Literature, 23(2), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v23i2.5595
Taufiqurrohman, M. M. (2021). Meninjau Penerapan Ambang Batas Pemilihan pada Sistem Pemilihan Umum Proporsional di Indonesia. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 12(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.12.1.2021.128-143
Thomas N Huckin. (1977). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Discourse of Condescension.
Zhang, B., Sandaran, S. C., & Feng, J. (2023). The ecological discourse analysis of news discourse based on deep learning from the perspective of ecological philosophy. PLoS ONE, 18(1 January), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280190
Zhang, R. (2022). The year’s work in ecolinguistics 2021. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Majid Wajdi, Asrumi Asrumi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
