Analyzing conversational implicatures in a synchronous online class on pragmatics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v5i2.158Keywords:
Conversational implicatures, Gricean maxims, cooperative principle, synchronous class, teacher-student classroom interactionsAbstract
Conversational implicatures are inherent in everyday interaction. Understanding how they emerge in synchronous class discussions can help shape clear communication beyond what is explicitly stated, thus improving class interaction and class management. However, research on conversational implicatures based on Grice’s Cooperative Principle in synchronous class discussions remains limited in Philippine context. Hence, this study aims to analyze conversational implicatures produced by both the teacher and students in a synchronous classroom setting. Data were gathered from verbatim transcripts of teacher-student interactions and analyzed using the framework of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. The findings reveal that both the teacher and students produced conversational implicatures that were highly dependent on the contextual situation, reflecting the dynamic nature of interaction in the online classroom. However, the teacher produced more instances of maxim flouting (18 out of 27), with the Maxims of Quantity and Manner most frequently flouted, often as a strategy to encourage students to think critically and respond independently and at the same time create a less restrictive environment. Students also tended to flout the same maxims (unclear and ambiguous), though less frequently (9 out of 27), particularly during recitations, as a response to the communicative situation (e.g., class participation and peer discussion). In contrast, the Maxims of Quality were less frequently flouted, indicating that participants generally maintained truthfulness in classroom discourse, while there was no instance of Relation flouting. Despite these instances of maxim flouting, both the teacher and students, generally, were able to successfully interpret the intended meanings, demonstrating pragmatic competence in understanding conversational implicatures within classroom interaction. The study also suggests the need for further research examining additional factors and comparing virtual and face-to-face contexts to provide deeper insights into the role of conversational implicature in human interaction.
References
Abdelhafez, A. M. (2016). The effect of conversational implicature instruction on developing TEFL students’ pragmatic competence and language proficiency. US-China Education Review A, 6(8), 451-465. http://doi.org/10.17265/2161- 623X/2016.08.001
Al Mseideen, A., Binti Yunus, K., & Almahasees, Z. (2025). The Impact of Online Learning on the Pragmatic Competence of Refusal Speech Acts: Perspectives of Jordanian Instructors. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 1026–1037. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8632
Ayunon, C. (2018). Gricean maxims revisited in FB conversation posts: Its pedagogical implications. TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 82-95. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244110
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Bouftira, M., Messaoudi, M. E., & Li, S. (2022). Developing EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence through a Blended Learning Model: A Quasi-Experimental Study. European Scientific Journal, ESJ. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n16p105
Bouton, L. F. (1988). A cross-cultural study of ability to interpret implicatures in English. World Englishes, 7(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1988.tb 00230.x
Bouton, L. F. (1994). Conversational implicature in a second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90065-5
Breheny, R., Ferguson, H. J., & Katsos, N. (2013). Taking the epistemic step: Toward a model of on-line access to conversational implicatures. Cognition, 126(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.012
Buchanan, R. (2013). Conversational implicature, communicative intentions, and content. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43(5-6), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2013.892758
Cutting, J. (2005). Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students [2nd Edition]. Routledge.
Dalle, M., Hasbi, M., & Abidin, A. (2025). A Gricean maxim analysis in English teaching and learning process at English learning centre. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 7(2), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v7i2.8462
Davis, W. (2024). Implicature. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2024 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/implicature/
Dewi, M. C. S., & Indriani, L. (2021). Unravelling the use of Quantity Maxim among EFL learners on online classroom interaction. New Language Dimensions, 1(2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v1n2.p55-64
Dewi, N. A. (2021). Conversational implicature based on maxim variation in EFL teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC 2021). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211212.042
Dewi, S., Aurora, X. D., Yuliani, C., & Fajriah, Y. N. (2025). Violation of Grice’s maxims in online classroom discussion: Implications for student-lecturer interaction dynamics. Journal of Advances in Linguistics and English Teaching, 1(2), 10-17. https://madanipublisherindonesia.or.id/index.php/jalet/article/view/15
Duan, S., Chen, X., … Gu, X. (2026). Memory: An adaptive contextual memory framework for aspect-based dialogue sentiment quadruple analysis. Journal of Information Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088467X261442525
Duffy, G. (2008). Pragmatic analysis. In A. Klotz et al. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations (pp. 168-169). Palgrave Macillan, Macmillan Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129_11
Edwards, A., & Westgate, D. P. G. (2005). Investigating classroom talk (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975718
Fahmi, R. (2016). An analysis of Grice’s maxims violation in daily conversation. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 4(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v4i2.325
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12020
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 183–198). Academic Press.
Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
Hashemian, M., Khoramshekouh, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2016). L2 learners’ enhanced pragmatic comprehension of implicatures via computer-mediated communication and social media networks. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 141-180. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijal.19.1.141
Ho, C.H. & Swan, K. (2007). Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice's cooperative principle. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 3-14. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved July 15, 2026 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/102629/.
Hossain, M. (2021). The application of Grice Maxims in Conversation: A pragmatic study. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(10), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal
Jahiu, E. (2025). The laughter as a strategic device: Exploring its pragmatic functions in conversations. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 4(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v4i2.123
Lane, J. (2020, May 19). Flowery language: Does it really make your writing more beautiful? Simon Fraser University Library. https://www.lib.sfu.ca/about/branches-depts/slc/incommon/flowery-language
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Mahmood, S. (2020). Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID ‐19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.21 8
Nensilanti, Jahrir, A. S., Saguni, S. S., Mahmudah, & Husain Subhan, A. M. F. (2025). Toxic Talk and Narrative Power in Virtual Arenas: A Pragmatic-Narrative Analysis of Impoliteness in Online Game Communication. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9945
Oskooei, S. A. K. (2020). Reflections on Jennifer Saul’s view of successful communication and conversational implicature. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 22(85), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.22091/jptr.2020.5550.2335
Pastini, N. W., & Hardina, H. (2025). Task-based language teaching in the Indonesian language classroom for foreign learners. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 3(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v3i3.395
Qin, R., Li, Z., Huang, K., … Gong, L., Liu, W., & Chen, L. (2025). Comparative efficacy of various virtual reality technologies on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 121, 105941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105941
Rosyidah, R. H. (2019). The violation of cooperative principle in conversational of presidential debate Indonesia 2019. English Learning Innovation, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v1i1.13165
Sadiyani, N. W., Mandang, S. R. I., & Somawati, N. P. (2025). Improving English speaking fluency in engineering students through problem-based learning (PBL). Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 3(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v3i3.394
Santuso, S., & Sukarno, S. (2025). Contrastive analysis of form and meaning of reduplication in Madurese and Minangkabau language. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v3i1.276
Tupan, A. H., & Natalia, H. (2008). The multiple violations of conversational maxims in lying done by the characters in some episodes of Desperate Housewives. k@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature, 10(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.10.1.63-78
Wahyudi, A., Yusuf, S., & Lestari, Z. W. (2020). Maxim’s flouting: An analysis of classroom interaction. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 219-231.
Wandira, B., Nasution, J., & Latiffani, C. (2022). Maxim violations in digital learning process during pandemic of Covid-19. Universitas Negeri Medan Repository. https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/
Wang, H. (2011). Conversational implicature in English listening comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1162-1167. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1162-1167
Yoshida, M. (1999). Comprehending conversational implicature in a foreign language: Is it a language problem or implicature problem? Bulletin of Heian Jogakuin Junior College, (30), 9–18.
Yule, G. (2023). The study of language (8th Ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009233446
Zahra, T. (2023). Exploring maxim of quantity in spoken academic discourse. Panacea Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 2(2), 208-2021. https://doi.org/10.59075/pjll.v2i2.307
Zhou, M. (2009). Cooperative principle in oral English teaching. International Education Studies, 2(3), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n3p42
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jerrymie Mila, Jeanard Anthony Robiego
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
