Exploring teachers’ corrective feedback strategies in English for specific purposes (ESP) descriptive text writing

Authors

  • Affied Alfayed Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Sri Hartiningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Muhammad Fadhil Hamdani SMKS Muhammadiyah 3 Singosari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v4i1.48

Keywords:

descriptive text, writing processes, ESP, English learning, correction feedback

Abstract

The growing demand for vocational education in Indonesia is driven by an increasingly competitive job market, requiring students to develop specialized skills, including proficiency in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). English teachers play a crucial role in enhancing students’ writing abilities, particularly in crafting descriptive texts relevant to their fields of study. However, limited research has explored how teachers provide corrective feedback in ESP writing instruction. This study investigates the corrective feedback strategies employed by an English teacher in a vocational school when teaching descriptive text writing. It also examines the rationale behind the teacher’s feedback practices. A qualitative case study approach was used, with data collected through interviews, classroom observations, and an analysis of students' written assignments. The findings indicate that the teacher primarily utilized oral corrective feedback during writing instruction, focusing on product description texts. The feedback strategies included explicit correction, metalinguistic feedback, and recasts. Explicit correction involved directly pointing out errors and providing correct alternatives, while metalinguistic feedback prompted students to self-correct by offering linguistic explanations. Recasts, on the other hand, involved reformulating students' erroneous statements in a more accurate form. The study further revealed that the teacher’s feedback approach was influenced by personal teaching experience and beliefs about effective language instruction. These findings highlight the importance of oral corrective feedback in improving students’ writing skills in ESP contexts. They suggest that teachers should adopt varied feedback strategies tailored to students’ needs to enhance learning outcomes. Future research could explore the long-term effects of different corrective feedback methods on students' writing development in vocational education settings.

References

Borg, S. (2019). Language Teacher Cognition: Perspectives and Debates. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_59-1

Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.

Fadzil, I. M., Ehsan, N., & Said, M. (2021). Exploring ESL teachers’ insights on corrective oral feedback in a Malaysian secondary education context. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(9), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.47405/MJSSH.V6I9.993

Farida, S. (2017). Analisis Historis Terhadap Kurikulum Pendidikan Iskam Pada Masa Habasiyah. Kabilah, Journal of Social Community, Vol 2/2.

Ha, X. Van, Nguyen, L. T., & Hung, B. P. (2021). Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective. Heliyon, 7(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E07550

Hidayah, N., Suparno, S., & Haryati, S. (2021). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices in using teacher written corrective feedback on students’ writing. English Education Journal, 10(1), 1–12.

Huhta, M., Vogt, K., Johnson, E., & Tulkki, H. (2013). Needs analysis for language course design: a holistic approach to ESP (M. Huhta, K. Vogt, E. Johnson, H. Tulkki, & D. R. Hall, Eds.). Cambridge University Press (CUP).

Isa, Q. N. M., Risdaneva, R., & Alfayed, A. (2017). An analysis of Acehnese EFL students’ grammatical errors in writing recount texts. Englisia Journal, 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v5i1.2301

Khanlarzadeh, M., & Nemati, M. (2016). The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 55–68. www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

Kim, Y., & Mostafa, T. (2021). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs and perspectives about corrective feedback. The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.027

Kubro, R. A., & Suyitno, I. (2019). Persuasive language in advertisement discourses (business advertorial analysis). ISLLAC: Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture, 3(2), 296–304. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jisllac

Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000390

Masykar, T. (2019). Analisa kebutuhan English for Specific Purpose untuk pendidikan vokasi. VOCATECH: Vocational Education and Technology Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.38038/vocatech.v1i0.9

Nassaji, H. (2015). The Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: linking theory, research, and practice. Bloomsbury.

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (Eds.). (2013). The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855

Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580

Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). The impact of teacher corrective feedback on EFL student writers’ grammatical improvement. English Language Teaching, 10(10), p43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ELT.V10N10P43

Sobhani, M., & Tayebipour, F. (2015). The effects of oral vs. written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ essay writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1601. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.09

Surani, D., & Fatoni, A. U. (2019). Students’ strategy in describing a product: the case of ESP writing. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v13i01

Vadakalur Elumalai, K. (2019). Teacher constructed corrective feedback enhancing students writing skills in EFL classroom. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 103. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.5p.103.

Wajdi, M. (2018). Classroom Discourse: A Model of Classroom Language Research. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Publishing.

Zhu, H. (2023). Measures for instructors to provide corrective feedback in L2 writing classes in high school. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(10), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSS.2023.1110036

Zohrabi, K., & Ehsani, F. (2014). The role of implicit and explicit corrective feedback in Persian-speaking EFL learners’ awareness of and accuracy in English grammar. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.637

Downloads

Published

2025-04-02

How to Cite

Alfayed, A., Hartiningsih, S., & Hamdani, M. F. (2025). Exploring teachers’ corrective feedback strategies in English for specific purposes (ESP) descriptive text writing. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 4(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v4i1.48

Issue

Section

Articles