Co-creation in English teaching: Enhancing student engagement and learning in an English language education program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v4i1.51Keywords:
collaborative learning, active learning, grammar instruction, writing pedagogy, translation studies, co-creationAbstract
Innovative teaching approaches that foster active learning are increasingly recognized as essential in modern education. One such approach is co-creation, which emphasizes student engagement, collaboration, and shared responsibility in the learning process. This study aims to explore the implementation of co-creation in teaching Basic Grammar, Basic Writing, and Translation and analyse its impact on student learning outcomes. A qualitative research methodology was employed, focusing on students enrolled in the English Language Education Program. Data collection methods included focus group discussions, classroom observations, and interviews to gain insights into students’ experiences with co-creation-based instruction. The study was conducted at a higher education institution specializing in English language education. The findings reveal that various co-creation techniques—such as peer feedback, collaborative writing projects, grammar exercises, and interactive translation tasks—positively influenced student engagement, autonomous learning, and critical thinking. Students demonstrated a greater sense of responsibility in their learning, enhanced communication skills, and improved comprehension of language concepts. Additionally, co-creation facilitated a more interactive classroom environment where students actively contributed to the learning process rather than being passive recipients of knowledge. Overall, the study concludes that co-creation is an effective pedagogical strategy that enhances learning experiences in English language instruction. Its implementation fosters collaboration, motivation, and deeper understanding of grammar, writing, and translation. However, further research is recommended to examine quantitative impacts on student achievement, assess its applicability in broader educational settings, and explore potential challenges in implementation. Future studies may also investigate ways to optimize co-creation methods for different learning styles and subject areas.
References
Bovill, C. (2017). A Framework to Explore Roles Within Student-Staff Partnerships in Higher Education: Which Students Are Partners, When, and in What Ways? International Journal for Students as Partners, 1.
Bovill, C. (2019). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C., Alison Cook-Sather, & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching (2): Practical guidance for academic staff and academic developers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271200592
Cresswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. SAGE Publication.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2012). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Giner, G. R., & Rillo, A. P. (2016). Structural equation modeling of co-creation and its influence on the student’s satisfaction and loyalty towards university. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 291, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2015.02.044
Harvard Family Research Project. (2010). Partnerships for learning: Promising practices in integrating school and out-of-school time program supports.
Kaminskiene, L., Žydžiunaite, V., Jurgile, V., & Ponomarenko, T. (2020). Co-creation of learning: A concept analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.2.337
Lau, J., & Chan. J. (2015). What is critical thinking? Philosophy Department, University of Hong Kong.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2017). Co-creation of the curriculum: challenging the status quo to embed partnership. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(2).
Magolda, B. (1999). Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship: constructive developmental pedagogy. Vanderbilt University Press.
Magolda, M. B. B., & King P.M. (2004). Learning partnerships: Theory and models of practice to educate for self-authorship. Stylus Publishing.
Mincu, M. E. (2012). Personalisation of Education in Contexts. In Personalisation of Education in Contexts. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-028-6
Selfa-Sastre, M., Pifarré, M., Cujba, A., Cutillas, L., & Falguera, E. (2022). The Role of Digital Technologies to Promote Collaborative Creativity in Language Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828981.
Wajdi, M. (2018). Classroom Discourse: A Model of Language Classroom Research. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Publishing.
Witell, L., Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., & Löfgren, M. (2011). Idea generation: Customer co-creation versus traditional market research techniques. Journal of Service Management, 22(2), 140–159.
Zarandi, N. (2022). Students’ Satisfaction and Co-creation Behavior in Game-based Learning Environment in Higher Education. Universidadedo Minho.
Zmuda, A., Curtis, G., & Ullman, D. (2015). Learning personalized: the evolution of the contemporary classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sahyoni Sahyoni, Lia Agustina Damanik, Hanifah Oktarina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.